Skip to content
Entourage

IVD

Your IVD through the IVDR, from classification to post-market.

We guide class A to D through classification, performance evaluation, conformity assessment, EUDAMED registration and ongoing post-market surveillance.

Book an intro call on IVD

Overview

The IVDR paradigm shift translated into a workable development reality.

Risk classes
A · B · C · D
EU framework
IVDR (EU) 2017/746
QMS
ISO 13485
US market access
FDA 510(k) / PMA

We support manufacturers of in vitro diagnostics across the full lifecycle: from classifying the portfolio under Annex VIII of the In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (EU) 2017/746, through performance evaluation under Art. 56 and Annex XIII, the QMS under ISO 13485:2016 and the technical documentation, to certification by the notified body, EUDAMED registration and ongoing post-market surveillance. The critical fork is rarely the assessment itself, but notified body availability and clinical performance, which for legacy products is often the largest evidence gap and requires lead time for study planning and ethics committee approval.

For decision-makers

A classification corrected late changes the conformity route, deadlines and evidence needs in one stroke. The extended transition periods only apply with a timely application and a signed agreement with the notified body, and post-market obligations already apply to legacy products during the transition period.

Key regulations & standards

Which standards apply in which phase?

What delays projects is rarely a missing standard, it is the sequence. This is how the requirements interlock across the entire lifecycle.

  1. 01

    Classification

    • Class A-D (Annex VIII IVDR)
    • Intended purpose & target market
    • Risk management (ISO 14971)
  2. 02

    Performance evaluation

    • Scientific validity
    • Analytical performance (ISO 17511)
    • Clinical performance (Annex XIII)
  3. 03

    Regulatory & approval

    • Technical documentation (Annex II/III)
    • Conformity assessment (Annex IX-XI)
    • Notified body (class B-D)
    • QMS (ISO 13485)
  4. 04

    Launch

    • CE marking
    • EUDAMED / UDI
    • FDA 510(k) / PMA (in parallel)
  5. 05

    Post-launch

    • Post-market surveillance & vigilance
    • PMPF (Annex XIII Part B)
    • Periodic Safety Update Reports

Industries

What challenges shape IVD?

Reclassification of the entire portfolio under Annex VIII

The IVDR (EU) 2017/746 replaces the self-certification of Directive 98/79/EC with a risk-based system using classes A through D. According to industry estimates, the vast majority of IVDs require a notified body for the first time. The rules in Annex VIII up-classify entire product groups, for example infectious disease diagnostics and companion diagnostics; a class corrected late changes the conformity route, deadlines and evidence requirements all at once.

Clinical performance evidence for classes C and D

The performance evaluation under Art. 56 and Annex XIII rests on three pillars: scientific validity, analytical performance and clinical performance, documented in the Performance Evaluation Report. Many manufacturers have robust analytical data but no clinical performance evidence. Literature alone rarely suffices; in-house performance studies under ISO 20916:2019 need lead time for study planning and ethics committee approval.

Limited notified body capacity

Only a few notified bodies are designated for the IVDR. Certification procedures currently take a long time, and signing the contract early is often the real chokepoint, not the assessment itself. The extended transitional periods under Art. 110, amended by Regulations (EU) 2022/112 and (EU) 2024/1860, apply only under certain conditions, including a timely application and a signed agreement with the notified body.

Companion diagnostics in step with drug development

Companion diagnostics fall into class C under Annex VIII and require consultation of a medicines authority or the EMA within the conformity assessment procedure. Development must be synchronized with the medicinal product's timeline, which calls for coordinated management of performance studies, technical documentation and authority interaction across multiple stakeholders.

Post-market obligations already apply to legacy products

Under Art. 110(3), the IVDR requirements for post-market surveillance, vigilance and registration already apply during the transitional period for legacy products, not only once the new certificate is issued. These include the PMS plan and PSUR under Art. 78 to 81, the reporting system under Art. 82 et seq. as well as registration in EUDAMED with UDI marking. The gap surfaces at the latest during the notified body audit.

The real break with the IVDR is not the new products, but rather the existing portfolio. Reclassification under Annex VIII suddenly requires performance evidence and a notified body for products that were self-certified for years, and that evidence cannot be built retroactively, it has to be planned in from the start.

Dr. Jennifer Neff · Vice President Medical Device

Why Entourage

What sets us apart from classic consultancies and freelancers.

Entourage
  • Industry focus100% life sciences
  • Deliveryoperational, on site
  • Regulatory depthGxP, FDA, EMA, MDR/IVDR
  • Flexibilityproject or framework contract
Large consultancies
  • Industry focuscross-industry
  • Deliverymostly strategic
  • Regulatory depthgeneralist
  • Flexibilitylong contract terms
Freelancers
  • Industry focussingle niche
  • Deliverysingle person
  • Regulatory depthown niche
  • Flexibilityday rate

Expertise

Our expertise for IVD

Next step

Where does your project stand regulatorily?

Use our free readiness checks for a first assessment, or talk to an expert directly, without obligation.

  • 100% life sciences
  • 500+ projects completed
  • Reply usually within one working day

Contact

Your contacts for IVD

Dr. Jennifer Neff

Dr. Jennifer Neff

Vice President Medical Device

Strategic lead for the medical device division, advising on MDR compliance, clinical evaluation and conformity obligations.

Get in touch
Dr. Julia Beck

Dr. Julia Beck

Head of Sales MedTec

Responsible for client relationships and the sale of tailored consulting solutions in the MedTech and IVD space.

Get in touch

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Regulation (EU) 2017/746 has reversed the logic of Directive 98/79/EC. Under the IVDD, self-certification was the norm; under the IVDR it is the exception. The classification rules in Annex VIII assign IVDs to classes A through D on a risk basis; only non-sterile class A remains self-certified. According to industry estimates, the vast majority of IVDs therefore require a notified body in the conformity assessment procedure for the first time.

Sources
  • Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR), primary text, Art. 5, 10, 56, 78-82, 110, Annex I, II, III, VIII, XIII
  • Regulation (EU) 2022/112, amendment to the IVDR transitional provisions
  • Regulation (EU) 2024/1860, staggered extension of the transitional periods and EUDAMED rollout
  • Directive 98/79/EC (IVDD)
  • ISO 13485:2016, ISO 14971:2019, ISO 20916:2019, IEC 62304
  • Widget of the existing industry page: entourage-website-writer/output/industry-pages/ivd/ivd-widget.html
  • https://theentourage.de/branchen/ (industry hub, live content)

Have a concrete project?

Briefly outline your situation. We'll respond with an initial assessment, usually within one business day.

Prefer direct? +49 89 4161170-0
info@theentourage.de

  • Reply usually within one working day
  • 4 offices: DE · CH · IT · US
  • 100% life sciences